1946 bc12d/85

[Guest]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Dave, I'm not sure I agree. This is a discussion forum. While this is a for sale section there is often some quite useful information posted here. I feel that if it is not discussed here it will not be talked about, or lost in the shuffle. There are plenty of places a person can post an ad where no comments can be made.

Hi Tom,

Its just my opinion.

Someday I may disagree with it.

I can't guarantee it is correct I can only guarantee that it is my opinion as of today.

We all have to do what we think is right. That's the best we can hope for.

You have made some good points.

Dave

[NC36061]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

I kinda agree with drude, yes it is a discussion forum, but there are plenty of other areas on here to discuss anything you want. Obviously if you have something relevant to a particular part or airplane listed for sale, that's perfectly fair to comment and discuss within this forum page, but I think its rather discourteous to drift an OP's for sale listing, and obviously it is not always understood or appreciated. That being said, unless the mods make and enforce a rule about this, common sense and courtesy must be used, and I'm sure is greatly appreciated.

So back to the OP; Roy, your airplane sounds like it could be a good one, $15k for an 85hp sounds like a great buy, but please provide more info re. the age and type of fabric, times, prop specs, etc and post some pix when you get a chance.

Dave

[Roy]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Roy, sorry my comment on the logbooks was not directed at your airplane. RyanShort1 had a bought a Taylorcraft to use for light sport training, only to find out it had once had a inflight controllable propeller installed. He was forced to sell that airplane, because it couldn't be used for sport pilot training. Now he is back on the forum with a newly purchased airplane.

I am the one who is most sorry! I asked my wife of 48 years to read it to see if I over reacted. She told me that I was a ....MORON enough said. I will continue to enjoy all the great post on taylorcraft and keep my mouth shut in the future. Again I am truly sorry. Roy

[Roy]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

I am sorry that I jumped to conclusions on the post, I was wrong and apologize to all the members, especially Tom and will try to be a better member in the future, Roy

[Hank Jarrett]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

You guys failed to notice that almost every person on here is a moron at some time or another? That gets you todays moron award! Enjoy it, you will be passing it to another one of us by tomorrow. ;-)

Hank

We don't sweat small problems or insults to each other here. Just blame it on communication through the internet instead of face to face.

[VanDy]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Well put hank, there is a lot of communication lost through typed words.

You guys failed to notice that almost every person on here is a moron at some time or another? That gets you todays moron award! Enjoy it, you will be passing it to another one of us by tomorrow. ;-)

Hank

We don't sweat small problems or insults to each other here. Just blame it on communication through the internet instead of face to face.

[crispy critter]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Roy,
I think toms a great guy and i know he would not take offense to an easy mistake. I read it the same way you did the first time but I had missed a couple of posts and had to re-read to know what airplane he was really talking about. Easy mistake.

If these guys gave me the boot everytime I stuck my foot in my mouth on here I probably would've been banned from the site at least a dozen times by now,lol.

[Roy]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Thanks Kevin, It was an embarrassing moment for me! I am glad Tom let me off easy, I agree he sounds like a great guy!

[3Dreaming]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Thanks Kevin, It was an embarrassing moment for me! I am glad Tom let me off easy, I agree he sounds like a great guy!

Roy, I didn't take your post as a personal attack. I knew it was a simple misunderstanding. That is why I went on to explain it in my first reply. Tom

[Robert Lees]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

... If these guys gave me the boot everytime I stuck my foot in my mouth on here I probably would've been banned from the site at least a dozen times by now,lol.

Aw, come on Kevin, don't be so hard on yourself. It's a couple of dozen by now!

[Roy]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Roy, I didn't take your post as a personal attack. I knew it was a simple misunderstanding. That is why I went on to explain it in my first reply. Tom

Thanks Tom, My wife has been telling me for years, that Iam too sensitive,She is right, as usual. Thanks again, Roy

[crispy critter]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Easy there rob....i might make it two dozen and one. Lol......as much as i hate to admitt it, you probably speak words of truth. I'll try to do better from now on rob, I'd hate to get blackballed....again

[Fooey]

Re: 1946 bc12d/85

Now everyone has kissed and made up how bout some pics and spacifics on the bird. Is gross now 1280? etc.

Thanks,
Tim