Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • n6346m
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Originally posted by mohawktipi View Post
    I've wanted to put the Grove gear on my L-2. In addition to eliminating the bungees, I think it would improve aerodynamics.
    Tom,
    I'm a little late joining this conversation but what's wrong with the L-2 gear? I like mine real fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • crispy critter
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Originally posted by cubby View Post
    Kevin i couldn,t have said it any better, your correct i own a 170B, a cub, and a Taylorcraft ,your correct pilots come in to fast, bounce then blame the Aircraft.

    you did a nice job on the C170, you were working on,have a great day ,
    and Happy New Year
    Paul.
    Thanks Paul, I've put a lot of work into her

    Leave a comment:


  • Bonanza91K
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    I had streamlined tail brace wires on a Super Skybolt (300HP), S1-T Pitts and an Extra 230. A few thousand snap rolls without any problems.

    Jim

    Leave a comment:


  • Hank Jarrett
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    The rich guys don't know what they are missing, but it sure is fun to show them! Most won't give up their speed wagons, but some HAVE been known to get a second FLYING plane to go with their "transportation" plane.

    Hank

    Originally posted by astjp2 View Post
    Yeah, and there is several service bulletins that require them to be removed, piper had them on a lot of models and most converted to round wires because of vibration and breaking problems. If you want to go fast buy a mooney or a bonanza, most people on here either are too cheap or too poor to own those so they stick with a Taylorcraft. Me I am too poor to own anything else..

    Leave a comment:


  • astjp2
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Yeah, and there is several service bulletins that require them to be removed, piper had them on a lot of models and most converted to round wires because of vibration and breaking problems. If you want to go fast buy a mooney or a bonanza, most people on here either are too cheap or too poor to own those so they stick with a Taylorcraft. Me I am too poor to own anything else..

    Originally posted by Mark Julicher View Post
    Lots of planes use streamline wires on the empennage, but they are expensive.
    Last edited by astjp2; 01-14-2017, 09:37.

    Leave a comment:


  • astjp2
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    The bungies don't oscillate like springs do...that's why they still used bungies on a lot of airplanes and don't convert them. The Burls kit for a cub is around $4,000 Tim



    Originally posted by mohawktipi View Post
    This is the type of landing gear suspension I would actually like to put on my L-2. Does anyone have a set of plans for this and could it be done, legally, without converting to experimental? I could still use the original covers so from the outside it would look the same.
    Last edited by astjp2; 01-14-2017, 09:46.

    Leave a comment:


  • Hank Jarrett
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Paul is right....but it is also tradition to poke at any other model or manufacture plane on these groups. Honest, it is ALL in fun and not serious.

    Hank

    EXCEPT of you fly one of those sissy nose draggers. ;-)

    Or God forbid one of those suck and blow flying blow torches!!!!! (except Naval Aviators.....and a few of Uncle Sams Misguided Children. They get a pass and don't bounce anyway, they ALWAYS approach way too fast and then do a controlled crash)


    HEY! Anybody know where the heck the ship is?




    Originally posted by cubby View Post
    Kevin i couldn,t have said it any better, your correct i own a 170B, a cub, and a Taylorcraft ,your correct pilots come in to fast, bounce then blame the Aircraft.

    you did a nice job on the C170, you were working on,have a great day ,
    and Happy New Year to you Sir.

    Paul.

    Leave a comment:


  • cubby
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Originally posted by crispy critter View Post
    Hey,take it easy on the 170 bashing. Airplanes don't bounce,pilots do....lol.
    Kevin i couldn,t have said it any better, your correct i own a 170B, a cub, and a Taylorcraft ,your correct pilots come in to fast, bounce then blame the Aircraft.

    you did a nice job on the C170, you were working on,have a great day ,
    and Happy New Year to you Sir.

    Paul.

    Leave a comment:


  • Forrest Barber
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    There have been Taylorcrafts with spring steel & carbon fiber Taylorcraft looked at the Wittman Tailwind way back in the 40's and had ideas ready if needed.
    Around here we had the sketches made up to solve a problem that never existed : WE designed a retractable landing gear for a Bensen B-8M "Gyrocopter". :yahoo:

    Leave a comment:


  • swoeric
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    the good suspension is aoss it is varying thickness of plastic disk to tune in the exact fell you like. very popular in supercub world. check out these on www.supercub.org lots of discussion

    Leave a comment:


  • 3Dreaming
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    There was somebody in Alaska the had a set up for the Super cubs using visco-elastic disk stacked together. They had a booth at Oshkosh a few years ago. I think they also had a replacement for the Taylorcraft tail brace wires. Tom

    Leave a comment:


  • mohawktipi
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Don't know the specifications on these springs but the Spacewalker has a max gross of 1450 pounds. My L-2 has max gross of 1300. I like this setup because it eliminates the bungies. Spring size could be adjusted as necessary. If I could get drawings I could figure out how to make them and test application. My L-2 is not flyable right now so it would be a good time to experiment.

    Leave a comment:


  • flyguy
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Comparing those springs to the ones used on a formula racer (say 1100 lbs spread over 4 springs) makes the size look totally inadequate. Tell me I am missing something here.
    Darryl

    Leave a comment:


  • mohawktipi
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    Here is a closeup of the Spacewalker landing gerar. Would be easy to install on my L-2 and could be covered to look stock. If anyone knows of drawings it would be appreciated.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Hank Jarrett
    replied
    Re: Is it blasphemy? - Grove landing gear

    The nice thing about tail wires is horizontal tails generally lift DOWN. The wires most likely to be corroded, get dings and NOT be inspected as well are the bottom ones (the ones NOT in tension most of the time). I would expect many more lower wires than upper have failed and since the top wires take the most load, the planes haven't been brought down.
    For once we get lucky, but I wouldn't push it. A flair with a broken upper wire could easily result in the stab bending down and a bunt into the ground. A really bad day!
    Hank

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X