Originally posted by flyguy
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
cylinder question
Collapse
X
-
Re: cylinder question
that would be true of a 6 cylinder where the throws are 60* apart. On the continental 4 cylinder they are 180* apart so the thows are at equal points of the rotation
-
Re: cylinder question
It is bad practice to run a mixture of cylinders on an engine. Running unbalanced (out of factory tolerences) on an undampended crankshaft will create a harmonics issue even if you do not feel it. The harmonics issue when coupled with a metal prop could cause the crankshaft to fail at some undetermined point in the future.
I can think of all kinds of reasons not to do it, and none for it.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
I don't think an oversize cylinder will be noticeable. I am sure there are plenty of planes flying that have that configuration. As previously mentioned, there is not really that much weight difference between a standard and oversize piston. Even pistons of the same diameter have differing weights. I think these variances are less nowadays with higher tech production techniques but I agree that at the relatively low rpm it will probably be unnoticeable. And the difference in power is going to be miniscule...
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
Probably will work, unfortunately you will only know till after start up and if you feel any more vibration. IT might be smoother! I had a Harley with .080 over on one cylinder and it was smoother.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
I installed a used engine in a T-Craft once and it had a mix of STD. and .015 cylinders. It ran just fine.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
I'll go with Richard on this one. Engines are never really balanced, as the effective weight on the throw varies as the engine rotates and the balance weight is pretty much an average. That means it is out of balance more often than in balance. Reciprocating engines are crude, frankly; but very tough.
Darryl
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
Robbie,
I put together several high performance engines when I was more into hot rodding. Every time I took an engine to the machine shop and told them I wanted it balanced, they asked me if I was going to use it for racing. When I told them, "no I just want it for high performance on the street", they always told me I was wasting my money. They always told me that I would never turn up enough rpms to make balancing worthwhile.
So............... with that admonishment in mind. And considering the fact that our little engines turn about 1/3 the rpm of my high performance street engines, I would suspect that the slight difference in weight between a standard piston and one .015" over would be unnoticable. I am sure that there are pistons in the air "as we speak" that have more weight in carbon buildup on them that what little extra the oversize piston would add.
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
can't i get some comments before I ask a question to my AP/IA.
Lostinspace need not comment
Leave a comment:
-
Re: cylinder question
Ok everyone give me their comments before I talk to my AP.
Does this mean you don't trust your A&P???
Leave a comment:
-
cylinder question
I found a standard cylinder that I want to have rebuilt.
The question is "My other cylinders are +.015 can I keep this one
at standard."
Does a + .015 piston weight that much more that a standard piston.
Ok everyone give me their comments before I talk to my AP.
I hate to bore a good standard jug out .015 if I don't have to.Tags: None
Leave a comment: