Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

    Originally posted by PA1195 View Post
    Does the added displacement require more fuel than the stock carb metering is designed for?

    Gary
    I wouldn't think so.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

      Originally posted by Edwin Otha View Post
      Didn't notice any differences from the 65 at 2300RPM.
      EO
      Originally posted by 3Dreaming View Post
      I wouldn't think so.
      That seems to also be the case when the C-85 is stroked and O-200 pistons and cylinders are installed...188 to 201 cubes. No carb change specified in the STCs.

      Gary
      N36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

        Originally posted by Leenicklas View Post
        I would like to know if you have or know of a 337 approving milennium cylinders on a 75 case?
        Not necessary, the Millennium cylinder is a PMA'd replacement for the 85 so just note it in the 337
        N29787
        '41 BC12-65

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

          Has anyone tried to contact Robert Franklin to see if his data is available for sale? If not we cannot use it in a certified airplane.....Tim
          N29787
          '41 BC12-65

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

            Originally posted by astjp2 View Post
            Has anyone tried to contact Robert Franklin to see if his data is available for sale? If not we cannot use it in a certified airplane.....Tim
            I doubt its for sale, its posted online. I found it and copied it from somewhere

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

              Originally posted by 3Dreaming View Post
              I wouldn't think so.
              I would think a minor change in jetting maybe required to something similar to C75 setup, although it does not specify it requires it.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

                The only thing that bothers me about this mod, it does not address piston cooling. Except for the A65, all other A and C series engines has a oil squirter pathway drilled in the rod cap to squirt oil onto the cylinder wall and bottom of piston. I think it should be a requirement as a part of the change.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

                  On most any other engine increased airflow flow through the cylinders or improved volumetric efficiency calls for more fuel. At some point the existing fuel metering system meets its capacity to maintain the designed air-fuel ratio at full throttle or rated rpm/power. How adding the displacement discussed here or in other STC's escapes that would be worth knowing.

                  Gary
                  N36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: 337's for 65 case alteration to 85 jugs

                    Most 65's have that included now....
                    Originally posted by Ragwing nut View Post
                    The only thing that bothers me about this mod, it does not address piston cooling. Except for the A65, all other A and C series engines has a oil squirter pathway drilled in the rod cap to squirt oil onto the cylinder wall and bottom of piston. I think it should be a requirement as a part of the change.
                    N29787
                    '41 BC12-65

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X