Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor weights

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Motor weights

    I cant seem to find true motor weights for apples to apples...


    what does

    o200
    c85
    lyc o230

    mags
    no starter
    or alt weigh

  • #2
    Re: Motor weights

    My records show:
    C-85 207#
    C-200 220#
    Lyc. 235 215#
    Lyc. 0320A 243#
    Lyc. 0320D 253# These may not be exact, but give a starting, "Ballpark" range.
    Dick Smith N5207M TF#159

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Motor weights

      here is the page out of the continental c75 threw 0200 manual
      Attached Files
      1940 BLT/BC65 N26658 SER#2000

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Motor weights

        Thank you much...I ask this in questioning the possibility to stc the 0235 into the gilbertti stc etc...it seams that weight is then negligible..I had read somewhere that the 0235 was 245 or 250 lbs and this would throw me out of what i was wanting...i also saw that they made a 135 hp 0235 and thought that this would be a good choice considering the number of them out there it may be better than the 0200 conversion

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Motor weights

          You will need to find a lyc cowling then or use a cub nose bowl with a custom cowling. The alaska boys used the cub nosebowl on the 320/360 conversions. Tim
          Originally posted by swoeric View Post
          Thank you much...I ask this in questioning the possibility to stc the 0235 into the gilbertti stc etc...it seams that weight is then negligible..I had read somewhere that the 0235 was 245 or 250 lbs and this would throw me out of what i was wanting...i also saw that they made a 135 hp 0235 and thought that this would be a good choice considering the number of them out there it may be better than the 0200 conversion
          N29787
          '41 BC12-65

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Motor weights

            Actually there are no motors on a Taylorcraft.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Motor weights

              Originally posted by drude View Post
              Actually there are no motors on a Taylorcraft.

              I thought so because I rod emy enginecycle down to the to pick up my Ford Engine Company truck this afternoon.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Motor weights

                Ok!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                1940 BLT/BC65 N26658 SER#2000

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Motor weights

                  Originally posted by nick View Post
                  I thought so because I rod emy enginecycle down to the to pick up my Ford Engine Company truck this afternoon.
                  good one Nick!

                  LOL



                  yes there are many paradoxes aren't there

                  Dave

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Motor weights

                    If a pair of shoes have a left and right and a pair of pants can have pockets, why can't a paradox have a front and back?
                    RC
                    Ron C
                    N96995

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Motor weights

                      But looking on the data plate for the powerplant in the Tcraft is says Continentals Motors, we had the discussion in High School, long, long ago, far, far way

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Motor weights

                        Originally posted by LostnSpace View Post
                        But looking on the data plate for the powerplant in the Tcraft is says Continentals Motors, we had the discussion in High School, long, long ago, far, far way
                        The discussions stems from the technical definition of motor and engine.

                        It goes something like this: a motor takes in power and converts it to motion and an engine takes in fuel or energy and coverts it to motion.

                        So an internal combustion engine is not a motor. It seems that the common usage has deviated from these definitions and they have morphed a bit.

                        Dave

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Motor weights

                          The internal combustion engine is of course not a motor but an engine, motor is the "mover" so an internal combustion engine used to move some thing (ie. airplane) is a motor.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Motor weights

                            Wow, we got off topic quick here....
                            N29787
                            '41 BC12-65

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Motor weights

                              Originally posted by astjp2 View Post
                              Wow, we got off topic quick here....
                              LOL

                              I may be the culprit.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X