Thanks Howard. I didn't even know how to research the historical FARs. I've gone through and read all that. To say the least, 23.1317 is a bit contradictory.
Be that as it may, those parts do not exist in the current Part 23. And I see no reference to any exceptions in the current Part 23 or 91.
For what it's worth, I don't have a copy of Norm's "bible", i.e. Aircraft Spruce, nor do I normally go perusing Part 23 for my General Operating and Flight Rules. My sole reference for those matters is FAR Part 61 and 91. If it isn't mentioned there, or at least reference made to another part, I have to figure it doesn't exist, hence my sparing with Norm.
I still maintain, even after reading this material, that an anticollision light system is required on all aircraft that are used to fly at night. But I can still be proven wrong. It just hasn't happened yet.
Cheers.
Be that as it may, those parts do not exist in the current Part 23. And I see no reference to any exceptions in the current Part 23 or 91.
For what it's worth, I don't have a copy of Norm's "bible", i.e. Aircraft Spruce, nor do I normally go perusing Part 23 for my General Operating and Flight Rules. My sole reference for those matters is FAR Part 61 and 91. If it isn't mentioned there, or at least reference made to another part, I have to figure it doesn't exist, hence my sparing with Norm.
I still maintain, even after reading this material, that an anticollision light system is required on all aircraft that are used to fly at night. But I can still be proven wrong. It just hasn't happened yet.
Cheers.
Comment