I took off the M74ck-0-46 Sensenich prop and swapped it with the McCauley, both were 74-43, I lost 150 RPM at static going to the McCauley. I may have to get the McCauley flattened to 40 or 41 to replace the climb performance I had. Tim
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
disappointed in McCauley prop
Collapse
X
-
See if the pitch is equal between props. I've heard Macs can vary from the factory and Gerry at Dominion use to check them closely. Call him and ask. Macs probably have a different airfoil.
Calculating prop pitch: https://www.sensenich.com/wp-content...1297966148.pdf
GaryLast edited by PA1195; 04-20-2020, 18:07.N36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85
Comment
-
When you make a propeller, the pitch will be basically constant at all blade stations, one rotation moves the prop forward 43 inches at all locations. A re-pitched prop is twisted from this condition and measured at the 70-75% blade station, so the pitch can be a gradual change from the 43 inches as manufactured. Re-pitched props can be a tough to compare. I have had better luck with McCauley 1B90 props, but with Sensenich making them too I don't know what's going to happen. I have a 1B105 I'm going to use on the current project.
Comment
-
Well I guess one could say that Tim's Sen prop was puny in engine loading at the same 74/43 pitch compared to an equivalent Mac. If the Mac loads the engine at the same pitch more...lower static rom...is that cause for disappointment?
Before I'd start changing anything I'd tie a big weigh scale to the tail and have a tug test for pounds of static pull for both then adjust.
GaryN36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85
Comment
-
According to TCDS 1A9 for aircraft S/N F-154 and up using an O-200: Maximum Normal Operating Power: 2500 rpm (73 HP) For all operations: 2750 rpm (100 HP) to comply with FAR 36.501 (noise abatement). I suspect Taylorcraft spec'd the Item 5 1B90 CM7443 based upon that limitation while meeting at least a minimum static of 2300. Yours is closer to that than 2400.
Before the prop shop twists the blade ask them to check the angles of each blade at the various stations used for that to see if it meets factory specs. Then for plus 30-50 rpm per inch pitch decrease. I'd want redline in flight unless cross-country ops are preferred.
GaryN36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85
Comment
-
To what end Gary? If I can get a 2350 static, that should give me great overall climb with an acceptable cruise. I may see if they can do a before and after report and dimensions check because I don’t have a history for this prop, I also have a new Sensenich prop to play with. There may also be a few restrictions basted on the engine stc so we will see what happens. TimN29787
'41 BC12-65
Comment
-
To what end Tim?..for the same reason you achieved your PhD...because you were curious and in the end it meant something to others. When one object behaves unexpectedly versus another when using a common source for the drive power plus common sense (Alaskan interviews remember?) dictates a "why?. Is the Mac correct before twist or not? If you let this comparison go we will have learned nothing about Sen vs Mac vs factory pitch distribution. Are you willing to learn and share?
GaryN36007 1941 BF12-65 STC'd as BC12D-4-85
Comment
Comment