Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

test

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • test

    Last edited by Robert Lees; 08-04-2005, 16:45.

  • #2
    Re: test

    Somebody got to Broadhead!
    20442
    1939 BL/C

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: test

      ...and went solo in a Piet too!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: test

        Now that is what I call flying.
        Vic
        N95110

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: test

          Great picture Rob,thanks for sharing.
          Kevin Mays
          West Liberty,Ky

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: test

            AKA. Mr. Proachpoint???
            Craig Helm
            Prior owner N8ZU '90 F21B
            KRPH

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: test

              Surprised it took you so long, Craig!

              I shall have to change my nom de plume now!

              (and now you may realise why I suggest moderating forums is not an easy task).

              Best regards,
              Rob

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: test

                How did you like your Pietenpol flight. I'd like to fly in an original to see how it compares to the GN1. I've got a little time in Steve's from the other forum. I'll say one thing about them, when they stop flying they REALLY stop flying.
                Craig Helm
                Prior owner N8ZU '90 F21B
                KRPH

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: test

                  To be fair, Craig, it's my only time in a Piet, and I don't know what a GN1 is (please educate me).

                  The stall was sharper (shorter wing?), and it would drop like a brick in the flare if allowed (and I am in agreement with your comment...and I was expecting it, and got away with it!)

                  In summation, I loved it, but I should say that anyone with >200 hours of low, slow, gentle tailwheel would manage it fine. The major difference was the lack of brakes (I fly my Tcraft from the right, so I am used to that), the skid (new to me...requires a burst of power to correct a swing...no brakes, remember?). And open cockpit..well I've been a passenger in several, but it is different when you are pilot in command. But I got used to it.

                  The one I flew had just completed the 40 hour sign-off, so I was very appreciative of the honour.

                  Rob

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: test

                    Looks like yours was an original Pietenpol. The GN-1 (Grega) was a modification of the original design. Continental engine and Cub gear are the main differences I'm aware of. There are others, but my knowledge of them is also limited. The one SteveR over at sp.com bought is a GN-1. I only flew it for a short hop over to a neighboring airport for some fuel. It has brakes and a tailwheel. I guess all those wires and braces make it really draggy at slow speeds.

                    You can see some of the differences in this pic.
                    Attached Files
                    Craig Helm
                    Prior owner N8ZU '90 F21B
                    KRPH

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: test

                      "Mine" had an original NX number, one of BP's originals. But it had an A-65. "Real Draggy"? Yeh, who's in a hurry?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X