Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

0235 vs c90 for a float plane

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: 0235 vs c90 for a float plane

    Originally posted by gcgilpin View Post
    What do the O-300 elbows give you (compared to the regular elbows)?
    They dont have the divits for the fuel injectors and they are about 5/16" taller which makes the elbow transition a little smoother. The Reno F1 guys use them so I have been told. Supposed to be good for 5 hp. Tim
    N29787
    '41 BC12-65

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: 0235 vs c90 for a float plane

      Originally posted by astjp2 View Post
      They dont have the divits for the fuel injectors and they are about 5/16" taller which makes the elbow transition a little smoother. The Reno F1 guys use them so I have been told. Supposed to be good for 5 hp. Tim
      wow 5 hp, I must check out the reno site
      Robert Bradbury
      BC12D Experimental
      C-FAJH C90
      Sen. 74X39 prop
      Seaplane 1650 Floats

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: 0235 vs c90 for a float plane

        I've got them on my engine but don't think they give an extra 5 HP. Maybe with total flow-matching.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: 0235 vs c90 for a float plane

          Originally posted by gcgilpin View Post
          I've got them on my engine but don't think they give an extra 5 HP. Maybe with total flow-matching.
          Probably right, 5hp does seem like a whole lot. Probably the elbows and entire induction cleaned up would help to get 5HP on our engines . The
          Reno engines are making almost twice the power of ours and at 4200 RPM
          so they would notice a bigger difference anyway since the air volume is that
          much greater .
          Robert Bradbury
          BC12D Experimental
          C-FAJH C90
          Sen. 74X39 prop
          Seaplane 1650 Floats

          Comment

          Working...
          X