Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

could be a loop hole ??? o-200

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

    Hi Rob,

    There are two sources for the C-85/O-200 conversion STC:

    STC SE02004AT Don's Dream Machines www.donsdreammachines.com/site/ in Georgia.

    STC SE00979AT Aircraft Specialties www.aircraft-specialties.com/ in Oklahoma.

    Aircraft Specialties lists the C-85/O-200 "kit" at $2630. They don't have a parts breakdown but I'm fairly certain that is for all the required parts (crankshaft, rods, pistons but no accessory case). There are two part numbers listed for their kits. Give them a shout (or email) to see what the applications are for the different kits.

    As Tim said, the accessory case for the -8 is the same for all the engines from A-65 through C-90. Early cases were magnesium while the late cases were aluminum. But, changing a C-85-12 to a C-85-8 is much more involved than just swapping accessory cases. The main cases are different, too. Continental recommended against converting any -12 to a -8 and vice versa because of the large number of parts that must be changed out. Fortunately, (again, as Tim already mentioned) Don Swords has an STC to convert any -12 (including the O-200) to a -8. That's the way to go if you want to do that conversion.

    Some random comments: The C-85/O-200 conversion does not make your C-85 into an O-200! It does give a slight increase in displacement (188 c.i. to 201 c.i.) and compression ratio (6.3:1 to 7.0:1). Most folks do report a noticeable increase in power but, the engine has a C-85 data plate, cam and C-85 operation limits. What you end up with is a strong C-85.

    The C-90 cam story is really interesting. The early C-90 cams were designed for straight, free flowing exhausts. As airframe manufacturers added larger and more restrictive exhausts to meet carb heat rise requirements and cabin heat comfort requirements, performance suffered. That's when Continental changed the C-90 cam and came out with SB-M49-17. Here's a link to that SB on the PopAv website;
    http://www.popav.com/docs/ContinentalSB-M49-17.pdf
    The SB explains the reasoning for the change and the part numbers required. The pn 530788 C-90 cam is the hot set-up as it has 35 degrees of overlap along with a different profile. However, to see the performance increase, you need a free flowing exhaust like the Luscombe dual stack system. These old cams are getting very hard to find. And of course, they are only legal for use in a C-90.

    The C-90 is rated for 90 h.p. continuous @ 2475 r.p.m. and 95 h.p. (5 minutes max although later Operations Manuals allow only 1 min) @ 2625 r.p.m. The only way to get the engine to turn up to 2625 r.p.m. is to use an adjustable pitch prop. A fixed pitch prop won't meet the static r.p.m. limits if it can turn up to 2625 r.p.m. on take off.

    Dan

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

      Thanks for the info about the cam, I hadn't thought thru the legality part.

      Engine was torn down and parts overhauled or replaced but not yet reassembled so I have time to react.

      I recall that the c90 cam and teh 0200 cam used different followers.

      Looks like I am in for a big bill!

      edit- opps just saw page 2 of teh thread, not as bad news as I thought, I can still use the 530788 cam, there was no need to replace it and that's what the bulletin calls out as the time to accomplish

      Dave
      Last edited by Guest; 01-29-2008, 13:20.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

        How is the cam still legal? If you send it to A/C Specialties for regrind, it comes back red tagged marked obsolete. Ask me how I know. Yes a great cam, I plan on running one in my clipwing if I can't come up with F-21 cowling for the O-235 I have.

        Mike

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

          Originally posted by Ragwing nut View Post
          How is the cam still legal? If you send it to A/C Specialties for regrind, it comes back red tagged marked obsolete. Ask me how I know. Yes a great cam, I plan on running one in my clipwing if I can't come up with F-21 cowling for the O-235 I have.

          Mike
          Hi Mike,

          Mine got yellow tagged, no explanation, just a fact.

          I sent some parts to D&S and some to A/C Specialties, don't recall where this part went to. I did get a copy of the service letter and warning not use the wrong followers.

          I think its legal based on the statement in the SL to accomplish when camshaft replacement is required at major overhaul.

          My crank was cracked at the flange and had to be replaced, cam came back with a yellow tag.

          Dave

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

            Typical A/C Specialties BS. Good for one, not the next, depends on how they feel that day or who is actually doing the work. I have been playing this game with them for many years. Oh well, there close and I like Bob.

            Mike

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: could be a loop hole ??? o-200

              There's a guy in Calif. that had them new old stock a few years ago.

              His name is Robert Weber and is in Trade-a-Plane

              Comment

              Working...
              X