Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

    I think the only fuselages that I have seen were that were powder coated were at the Taylorcraft factory when they were at La Grange . I never really checked into it but thought they looked really nice. After reading this thread I don't think I will consider using it .THANKS! This forum is a great source for information.
    Last edited by Buell Powell; 12-09-2007, 11:31.
    Buell Powell TF#476
    1941 BC12-65 NC29748
    1946 Fairchild 24 NC81330

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

      Factory , certified? Hmmmmm very interesting.
      Taylorcraft Foundation, Inc
      Forrest A Barber 330-495-5447
      TF#1
      www.BarberAircraft.com
      [email protected]

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

        There's a good case against it right there! The factory used it!!!
        I can see it now.......5 years later.....

        AD 2012-05-14 "to preclude fuselage tubing failure due to excessive hidden corrosion caused by powdercoating.......to comply with AD replace fuselage with new factory unit with epoxy primer!"
        If you can read this, thank a teacher....
        If you're reading it in english, thank the military

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

          I'm concerned that the next emergency AD might be on the landing gear. The factory web-site states that they will focus on building them in December.This time with landing gear ready to ship and no one else at all building them.
          Last edited by Buell Powell; 12-09-2007, 23:04.
          Buell Powell TF#476
          1941 BC12-65 NC29748
          1946 Fairchild 24 NC81330

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

            Come on Univair, wag-Aero, Airframe,get started on the gears, get your paper work in order.
            Buell's right,if the factory wants to start making them, here we go again with an AD.
            Robbie
            TF#832
            N44338
            "46" BC12D
            Fond du lac WI

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

              Here's a twist on the paint versus powdercoat question:

              What about blasting the tubing clean on a fuselage, then having it hot dip galvanized?

              The company I work for makes flatbed trailers that they send out for galvanizing. It's amazing how effective the coating is at preventing corrosion.
              Has it ever been tried on aircraft frames?
              John 3728T

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

                I would venture to suggest that neither powdercoating nor hot dip galvanising would meet with FAA approval, unless an STC or 337 is submitted.

                Neither process was used when the original TCDS was approved.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Prime & paint? Or Powdercoat?

                  The hot dip "aluminizing" was used once in a while on Taylorcraft exhaust systems on the F-19 & F-21 during the Feris era. The problem was repairing it if it got cracked, had to balst all that coating off first.
                  Taylorcraft Foundation, Inc
                  Forrest A Barber 330-495-5447
                  TF#1
                  www.BarberAircraft.com
                  [email protected]

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X