If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Looks like we will be getting my F-21B back together after Harry had it for three and one half years. Has anyone had any experience with putting an IFR package in a F-21B?
Are you thinking bare minimum to make it legal or a nice avionics stack?
Anything that was listed as an option on the original equipment list or in the type certificate data sheet can be installed with a logbook entry and weight and balance update. If it isn't on that list it needs a 337 (alteration) and perhaps an STC.
Our F-21 was an IFR trainer before we bought the wreck and rebuilt it. It is alot easier to do today with the avionics packages that are avialable now.
I don't want to hi-jack this thread, but I just had a thought. The FAA claims to promote air safety, yet their obstinance and bureaucracy keep us flying with 60 year old technology.
1946 BC-12D N96016
I have known today a magnificent intoxication. I have learnt how it feels to be a bird. I have flown. Yes I have flown. I am still astonished at it, still deeply moved. — Le Figaro, 1908
See Tom it is very easy to start a thread!! Sorry I did not get around to it last night. NOW! this thread is for useful information about having an IFR Taylorcraft. When I was with the factory, we worked with two buyers to work up IFR ships.
THE problems we encountered were fuel vent possible icing, heated pitot,
static source that was reliable in all flight attitudes, Soooo if anyone who has "approved data" please share with the others on this thread. We had a 1941, full IFR ship here many years ago with turnable loop antenna for the ADF, 2 VOR's , two big venturi's, very heavy.
Tom wants to have information available as his ship goes back together to become his dream machine.
Comment