Paul:
Thanks for the good info. So much to learn and so little time!
I will start by questioning again the folks at Crankcase Services who did my case for me. Then I will talk to Aircraft Specialties and Divco. The folks at Reno Air seem to know quite a bit too about these cases as I notice they say they can match case forging numbers with bearing requirements in their literature.
From what I can see, Crankcase Services did a nice job........looks pretty at least all alodined up. I used them for Tami's newly majored A65 too and it is running well.
I had to make some decisions about the engine while designing my new instrument panel for the electric upgrade and yes, one of them was to replace the pull starter, even though I had managed to procure a nice yellow tagged Delco Remy and a serviceable clutch/gear assembly. The fellow at Oshkosh showed me where the difference in price was on their starter compared to the Sky Tec. Seems much better made.
The ammeter issue needed to be sorted out too, so I decided to go with a 30 amp, picking up a NOS one at Oshkosh that fits well with the freshly overhauled original instruments. The alternator will be the new one from B&C. I will let you know how I make out on it. The B&C fellow didn't seem to think it would be a big deal to get it approved on a 337 and he said he would help. The "Win Me" Luscombe at Sun and Fun had one installed and approved. Seems funny to me that the starter and alternator get approved under the aircraft equipment, not the engine equipment, but that's the FAA's logic I guess.
Whose oil filter did you install? Sounds like a great idea. Mount on the firewall? Doesn't it allow you greater intervals between changes too------like 50 hours?
I knew the carbs were expensive, but $1600.......whew!!!!! But you gotta have one! How about converting one of my old Strombergs with a new venturi, jet, seat, and needle valve......then having it rebuilt?
As to the autogas STC, aren't we still dealing with a Continental C85? Wouldn't the autogas STC for it still apply? I remember in talking with Aircraft Specialty Services about doing the O-200 conversion they said they couldn't advertise the STC as anything other than a C85 (with a different crankshaft, etc). They couldn't "admit" that it put out any more horsepower, torque, or the like......."according to the FAA it's a Continental C85" they kept telling me, even though they and I both knew better on the performance issue. So, does it really need a different autogas STC......or does the FAA not know themselves whether it does or does not?
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Thanks for the good info. So much to learn and so little time!
I will start by questioning again the folks at Crankcase Services who did my case for me. Then I will talk to Aircraft Specialties and Divco. The folks at Reno Air seem to know quite a bit too about these cases as I notice they say they can match case forging numbers with bearing requirements in their literature.
From what I can see, Crankcase Services did a nice job........looks pretty at least all alodined up. I used them for Tami's newly majored A65 too and it is running well.
I had to make some decisions about the engine while designing my new instrument panel for the electric upgrade and yes, one of them was to replace the pull starter, even though I had managed to procure a nice yellow tagged Delco Remy and a serviceable clutch/gear assembly. The fellow at Oshkosh showed me where the difference in price was on their starter compared to the Sky Tec. Seems much better made.
The ammeter issue needed to be sorted out too, so I decided to go with a 30 amp, picking up a NOS one at Oshkosh that fits well with the freshly overhauled original instruments. The alternator will be the new one from B&C. I will let you know how I make out on it. The B&C fellow didn't seem to think it would be a big deal to get it approved on a 337 and he said he would help. The "Win Me" Luscombe at Sun and Fun had one installed and approved. Seems funny to me that the starter and alternator get approved under the aircraft equipment, not the engine equipment, but that's the FAA's logic I guess.
Whose oil filter did you install? Sounds like a great idea. Mount on the firewall? Doesn't it allow you greater intervals between changes too------like 50 hours?
I knew the carbs were expensive, but $1600.......whew!!!!! But you gotta have one! How about converting one of my old Strombergs with a new venturi, jet, seat, and needle valve......then having it rebuilt?
As to the autogas STC, aren't we still dealing with a Continental C85? Wouldn't the autogas STC for it still apply? I remember in talking with Aircraft Specialty Services about doing the O-200 conversion they said they couldn't advertise the STC as anything other than a C85 (with a different crankshaft, etc). They couldn't "admit" that it put out any more horsepower, torque, or the like......."according to the FAA it's a Continental C85" they kept telling me, even though they and I both knew better on the performance issue. So, does it really need a different autogas STC......or does the FAA not know themselves whether it does or does not?
Thanks again.
Cheers,
Comment