Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stewart Systems covering process discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Stewart Systems covering process discussion

    The Stewart Systems process is not the same as the Blue River process. There were a lot of problems with Blue River. The Stewart brothers (Dan and Doug) started out using Aircraft Finishing Systems in the early 2000's. They eventually bought the company and changed it to Stewart Systems. They have continuously updated and improved the processes. One of the most recent improvements was the paint process. The painting process is much easier to use and more durable, When they made this improvement the paint was tested by an independent lab. It passed a test by the lab that was equivalent to 7 yrs-24 hrs per day of Arizona sun. The test showed less than 1% of degradation. The oldest Stewart paint job is getting close to 20 yrs old. I have not seen this paint job but am told that it still looks "new". As far as durability i don't think there is anything to worry about.

    Mark Williams
    Restored Runway Classics
    601 S Main st
    Osceola IA 50213

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Stewart Systems covering process discussion

      Thanks guys, I appreciate the info.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Stewart Systems covering process discussion

        I've got samples from the 90's (when I was part owner of the system) and they're still able to be wadded up in a ball and flattened back out without any cracks. Like was said before, this is NOT the Blue River Process. The Blue River System's topcoat was called "hydrogloss" and it was awful! I never did see any that didn't crack! The topcoat that is used with this system is a pure polyurethane and the most flexible thing you're ever going to find! Good stuff!
        John
        I'm so far behind, I think I'm ahead

        Comment

        Working...
        X