Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Landing gear tube thicknes

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Landing gear tube thicknes

    eric he said he thought it would take over a year to get it and other things he had going took precedence over this. The bearing spacing is a little wider then then Cleveland as is shinn so the load on axle is the same
    Last edited by cvavon; 12-27-2011, 18:02.
    1940 BLT/BC65 N26658 SER#2000

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Landing gear tube thicknes

      I think selling gear legs for the 2200 would be difficult...there just arent that many of us looking for them...i plan on extending mine into the 3-6 inch range and still using bushwheels....if we cover the engineering basis for the 337 then it should be cheaper overall and you could still sell the gear legs for the 337.. it appears we just have a lot of traditionalist and those that really want the extended gears seem to have a dim eye on paper work...the cost of the stc and hardware would quickly exceed 20% the value of most aircraft.. eric i do prefer your method since we retain both sets of brakes with only two cylinders and factory pedals compared to the grove setup.....just thinking out loud here

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Landing gear tube thicknes

        Swoeric grove plans to use the stock pedals the masters bolt to the frame were the first pulley was bolted and hooks to stock pedals the masters are pull type i used scott masters like in the cubs
        1940 BLT/BC65 N26658 SER#2000

        Comment

        Working...
        X