Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wing rebuild

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Wing rebuild

    Hi gang,
    I finally got back into the rebuild of NC20407 last weekend. Some of you may remember that I had my wings rebuilt due to lack of time. They have been hanging in the garage for nearly two years now. In preparation for aileron work I wanted to hang the RH wing (the original 13 rib 1938 wing) on the plane. Rounded the help up to set in into place………what a disappointment that exercise was! Root fittings were 3/32” to narrow to fit the fuse fittings. I spent a couple hours with the tape checking out the various compression strut fittings on both wings. As far as I can tell, the 1938 wing panel (and 1941) has only (2) different size compression struts. The short (1) being at the lift strut fittings because of the ply doublers. Seems like Mr. Goodwrench ignored the torque values on the root fitting fasteners and sunk the fittings/compression strut into the wood on both spars. It fit perfect before the rebuild! After getting over the disappointment of knowing I now had to at least partially disassemble the wing(s), I tore into the RH wing and am glad I did. Notice anything missing on either spar end…..like ply doublers! No ply doubler on that aft spar(for some reason) reminded me of the root fittings on a Henderson Longster. The guy two owners back regularly did aerobatics in this ship! That gave me a shiver.
    I scratched my bald noggin for a while thinking how I was going to add doublers. After much fussing, I finally set my skillsaw to a depth of 1/16” and scored the spar face every ¼”. I then carefully chisled the stock off to the depth of the score lines. Finally, I used my palm sander and belt sander to just remove the score lines. The nose roller of the belt sander gave a blend radius that matched that of the jointed relief of the ‘41 spars perfectly. It actually worked out very well and I did not have to disassemble the entire wing. I took careful measurements of the 1941 wing (LH) and made 1/16” ply doublers to match. Glued up the inside doublers last night. I will work on the outside surfaces tonite. I will take some more pics of the scoring process tonite if anyone is interested.

    Feels good to finally be making progress on 20407 again!
    Attached Files
    MIKE CUSHWAY
    1938 BF50 NC20407
    1940 BC NC27599
    TF#733

  • #2
    Re: Wing rebuild

    Mike,
    There should actually be 3 different lengths for the drag struts for the early wings-They are listed as part numbers, B-A 801 for No. 1 strut,B-A 89 for struts 2,3,4,@6 and B-800 for strut no. 5 (the shortest one). Not sure if all the post war B Models had 3 lengths but for the F19 they changed and left out the B-A 89s and used B-A 801s for 1,2,3,4, and 6 and used shims for them on each end to make up the difference in length. Also the spars on the F19 and most of the ones I have seen are routed and then 1/16 doublers added so that seems like a good idea. If yours does have 3 strut lengths then you should be able to take the one in that position now and check it against the others to find it then swap them and the fittings should line up.
    Last edited by Buell Powell; 04-12-2010, 17:15.
    Buell Powell TF#476
    1941 BC12-65 NC29748
    1946 Fairchild 24 NC81330

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Wing rebuild

      Buell,

      I have to eat crow!

      I took a closer look at compression struts tonite. I cut an ash measuring stick that was just a slip fit between the faces of the wing root end strut. I checked it against all the other struts with the obvious exclusion of the strut at the lift strut fittings. All struts were within 1/64" of that stick.....with the exception of the wing tip compression strut which appears to be about 1/16" shorter. In looking at the two a little closer it is fairly obvious that these are meant to be the end struts. Where all other compression struts are pierced/punched for (4) spoke nipples, these two are only punched for (2). The opposing hole is undersize and probably only there as a pilot and to make use of a common base part before welding. Notice the size of the nipple hole in one pic vs. the other. Riddle solved.

      I will remove the outboard strut tomorrow for a closer measurement.
      Attached Files
      MIKE CUSHWAY
      1938 BF50 NC20407
      1940 BC NC27599
      TF#733

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Wing rebuild

        Mike,
        Looks like you have it figured out. The difference seems about right -it's just the thickness of the fitting material because the strut end sits over it on the end of the first strut of the rear spar and you should have a washer the same thickness for a spacer for opposite end of the flange bolt.. After you get it all back together and trammeled then you might just check to see if the distance is the same all the way down between the spars and the spacing is right for the fuselage fittings and it should line up for the fuselage fittings.
        Last edited by Buell Powell; 04-13-2010, 06:24.
        Buell Powell TF#476
        1941 BC12-65 NC29748
        1946 Fairchild 24 NC81330

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Wing rebuild

          A few more pics of the process. Worked out great! Less than 1/64" of variation in thickness anywhere across the doublers. I am happy the doublers are there now.
          Attached Files
          MIKE CUSHWAY
          1938 BF50 NC20407
          1940 BC NC27599
          TF#733

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Wing rebuild

            Does any one have a measurement for the first drag strut on a BC12D wing it is part no. B-A 801 as you can read above it was used at the wing root , not much shorter than the one next to it but maybe 3/16 of an inch, thanks

            Comment

            Working...
            X