Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Static "port"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Static "port"

    Tim:
    great picture. A wood and steel machine!

    You're onto a little backwater of the art world called "steampunk". The steampunk artists paint, photograph (or even make their own) pseudo-Victorian machines. They live in a alternate-history, post-industrial, non-electrical idealized world. Steampunkers love dirigibles but would be fascinated by a stock Taylorcraft. And I think most T-craft fans would appreciate steampunk art.

    Google "steampunk" if you'd like to see more or go the great UK based steampunk forum called brass goggles.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by mulwyk; 03-05-2010, 08:08.
    Bob Gustafson
    NC43913
    TF#565

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Static "port"

      Originally posted by mulwyk View Post

      You're onto a little backwater of the art world called "steampunk". The steampunk artists paint, photograph (or even make their own) pseudo-Victorian machines.

      So these perverts get off on sort of a Jules Verne kink... I like it! There's hope for free thought after all...

      Try to get these guys interested in modern recreations of the early unsuccessful aircraft designs, such as the "Aerial Steam Carriage" , "Wenham's Aerial Locomotion" and numerous other fantasies that never quite made it.


      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoplane_(1874)


      Taylorcraft : Making Better Aviators for 75 Years... and Counting

      Bill Berle
      TF#693

      http://www.ezflaphandle.com
      http://www.grantstar.net
      N26451 (1940 BL(C)-65) 1988-90
      N47DN (Auster Autocrat) 1992-93
      N96121 (1946 BC-12D-85) 1998-99
      N29544 (1940 BL(C)-85) 2005-08

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Static "port"

        Here's a pic of my static port as installed. Pearson asked if I've checked my speeds with this setup. Really, the answer is no. Not well enough to document whether this is a good idea or not. When I did this, I didn't know anything about Taylorcrafts, but other planes that I had flown had something like this. So I just did it.
        I'm pretty sure that my airspeed indicator reads in the right ballpark. Maybe it indicates slightly (3-5ish mph) below actual airspeed in cruise. This is just anecdotally surmised by comparing it to a GPS in various wind conditions and making mental averages over many flights. Nothing scientific.
        Attached Files
        Tim Hicks
        N96872

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Static "port"

          They came from the factory with port out in the wing, inside cabin varies with the cabin of course. We did find a good place for the F-19 & up on the fuselage. IF you are IFR use the two line system out to the jury strut and forward, IF you are just a plain old Taylorcraft put it out into the wing; that "comforms to the TC".
          Last edited by Forrest Barber; 03-14-2010, 07:44. Reason: sp
          Taylorcraft Foundation, Inc
          Forrest A Barber 330-495-5447
          TF#1
          www.BarberAircraft.com
          [email protected]

          Comment

          Working...
          X